Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) is the process of collecting, analyzing, and applying data on cyber threats, adversaries, and attack methodologies to enhance an organization's security posture. It involves taking raw threat data from various sources and transforming it into actionable insights that enable organizations to anticipate, detect, and respond to cyber risks. Threat intelligence can be categorized into strategic intelligence, operational intelligence, and tactical intelligence, all of which offer strategic advantage against cybercriminals, nation-state actors, and insider threats. Properly informed and equipped, organizations can move beyond reactive defense and adopt a proactive security approach to mitigate risks before they materialize.
In a world where virtually every industry, organization, and individual increasingly relies on digital systems, identifying and mitigating the risk of cyberattacks is a crucial proactive security measure.
Cyber threat intelligence (CTI) represents the information an organization gathers and analyzes about potential and ongoing threats to cybersecurity and infrastructure.
Threat intelligence gives chief information security officers (CISOs) and security teams valuable insights about potential cyberthreat actors’ motivations and methods to help security teams anticipate threats, enhance cyber defense programs, improve incident response, decrease cyber vulnerability, and reduce potential damages caused by cyberattacks.
Cyber threat intelligence is an essential component of an organization's cyber resiliency, which includes “the ability to anticipate, withstand, recover from, and adapt” to threats, attacks, or compromises on systems, according to NIST.
Threat Intelligence fuels cybersecurity programs by providing powerful tactical information that organizations can use to better identify and respond to cyberattacks. The process of gathering this information also supports risk management by uncovering vulnerabilities in cybersecurity systems. Security teams are then able to allocate resources better to meet the most relevant cyber threats to their industry and protect valuable data, assets, and intellectual property.
Threat intelligence is pivotal in enhancing an organization’s cybersecurity posture, providing numerous benefits spanning proactive defense to informed decision-making. One of the most critical advantages is the enhancement of incident response capabilities. With relevant threat intelligence, incident response teams can detect, investigate, and mitigate security incidents more rapidly and effectively. Being informed about adversaries’ TTPs ensures that response teams can tailor their strategies to the specific threats they face, leading to more efficient containment and recovery.
Experienced threat intelligence analyst can enhance cybersecurity and resiliency on several levels, including:
Given the dynamic and complex nature of the cyber threat landscape, obtaining high-quality threat intelligence comes with several challenges, including:
Threat intelligence, essential for proactive cybersecurity, covers a broad range of information and analysis and can be categorized into several standard types of threat intelligence based on content and use cases. It can, however, be separated into three general categories, according to information type and application. Among the most prevalent are strategic, tactical, operational, and technical threat intelligence. A well-rounded CTI program will contain varying levels of each type to meet the organization's unique cybersecurity needs.
Strategic threat intelligence (STI) comes from high-level analysis of broad cybersecurity trends and how they might affect an organization. It offers insights about threat actors' motives, capabilities, and targets, and helps executives and decision-makers outside of IT understand potential cyber threats. Typically less technical and incident-specific than other types of CTI, strategic threat intelligence is often used to formulate risk management strategies and programs to mitigate the impact of future cyberattacks.
As the name implies, tactical threat intelligence (TTI) focuses on threat actors’ tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and seeks to understand how a threat actor might attack an organization. Tactical threat intelligence also explores threat vulnerabilities using threat hunting, which proactively searches for initially undetected threats within an organization’s network. TTI is more technical than STI and is typically used by IT or SOC teams to enhance cybersecurity measures or improve incident response plans.
More detailed, incident-specific, and immediate than STI and TTI, operational threat intelligence (OTI) is real-time data used to facilitate timely threat detection and incident response. CISOs, CIOs, and SOC members often utilize OTI to identify and thwart likely attacks.
Threat intelligence encompasses a wide range of information to provide organizations with insights into past, current, and potential future cyber threats. The data considered a part of threat intelligence includes:
Indicators of Compromise (IoCs): Observable data points that indicate a potential breach or malicious activity. Examples include:
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs): Descriptive details on threat actors’ operations, which can include:
Security teams map TTPs to frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK to build threat models, improve detections, and enhance automated defenses. Tracking TTPs enables organizations to anticipate evolving adversary behavior and strengthen cloud security strategies.
Threat Actor Profiles: Information on groups or individuals responsible for cyberattacks, including:
Vulnerability Information: Details about known weaknesses in software or hardware that can be exploited, such as:
Social Media and Dark Web Data: Information from online forums, social media platforms, or the dark web where threat actors might communicate, share tools, or sell stolen data.
Sources for threat intelligence are almost as varied as the cybersecurity landscape itself. The more common sources for CTI include:
CTI from internal and external sources offers different, yet equally important, insights regarding an organization’s threat landscape.
Analysis of internal data creates “contextual CTI” that helps an organization identify and confirm the most relevant threats based on individual circumstances, business systems, products and services. Reviewing information from past incidents can reveal indicators of compromise (IOCs), detail the cause and effect of a breach, and provide opportunities to improve incident response plans. Internal CTI also creates a greater understanding of an organization’s vulnerabilities, allowing CISOs and SOCs to develop more tailored and targeted cybersecurity measures.
External CTI provides the insights needed to stay ahead of current and upcoming threat actors. From global TTPs to sector-specific intelligence from sources like ISACs and industry peer groups, external CTI increases threat awareness and improves an organization’s ability to create a more powerful cybersecurity program.
A crucial element in any cyber threat detection and response program, intelligence-driven data fuels a proactive defense posture that helps organizations better understand their vulnerabilities, anticipate cyber threats, focus resources on the most significant threats, and develop an incident response plan that will minimize the impact of cyber attacks.
Intelligence-driven data can also provide a deeper understanding of risk management and compliance issues reducing potential financial and reputational damage resulting from a data breach.
You'll find a growing range of tools for generating cyber threat intelligence, each with unique forms and functions to fit an organization’s cybersecurity needs.
Combining the functions of several tools and threat intelligence platforms creates the most complete and thorough threat detection and prevention program.
Threat intelligence services support organizations’ cybersecurity efforts by providing CISOs and SOCs the tools to develop and optimize cyber threat analysis, prevention, and recovery programs. Effective CTI support increases overall threat awareness, enables proactive defense measures, enhances incident response plans, and improves decision-making and risk management.
An incident response plan (IRP) serves several purposes in a threat intelligence program. An IRP outlines how an organization will react to and recover from a cyber security incident. In addition to ensuring an organization’s preparedness for a cyber attack, a well-planned IRP will provide various types of threat intelligence that can be used to improve future cybersecurity measures.
The practical implementation of cyber threat intelligence begins with defining clear objectives and gathering relevant data from a variety of internal and external sources. Once analyzed, the data can be used to generate actionable intelligence designed to integrate into the existing cybersecurity program.
Applying the insights from your CTI program to your overall cybersecurity strategy will enhance threat awareness, attack prevention, and incident response. It is important to note that this integration may require adapting existing processes, adjusting control measures, updating plans, or modifying user training programs.
Sophisticated hackers can infiltrate a network and remain undetected while searching for or collecting data, login credentials, or other sensitive materials. Threat hunting is the practice of proactively searching for previously undetected cyber threats on an internal network. Threat hunting is crucial for eliminating advanced persistent threats (APTs).
The threat intelligence lifecycle is an outline of the process by which CISOs develop and implement cyber threat intelligence programs. It is a framework for continuously transforming raw threat data into actionable threat intelligence that can then be utilized to identify and avoid threats to an organization’s cybersecurity.
Figure 2: Operationalizing through CTA phases
This lifecycle ensures organizations maintain proactive defense postures by continuously adapting intelligence to on-premises and cloud-native attack vectors and adversary behaviors.
More than finding the right tools and searching for data, building an effective CTI program requires a strategy-driven plan, a team of specialists, well-organized processes, and an organization-wide commitment to continuous learning and improvement.
Figure 3. Unit 42 CTI Program Phases
The cyber threat landscape continuously changes as threat actors become more knowledgeable and sophisticated. An effective CTI program can only remain effective if it is as dynamic as the threats it is designed to thwart. Learning from previous incidents and threat intelligence feedback allows organizations to continuously adapt and enhance the elements of a CTI program, keeping it as relevant and effective as possible.
Cyberthreat intelligence trends will vary by industry, geography, and threat types. There are, however, several general trends that affect businesses and organizations of all kinds.
The emergence of the internet created an unprecedented level of information sharing and connection. As the digital landscape expanded, so did the need to protect individuals and organizations from the growing threat of cyberattacks.
Rapidly growing threats gave rise to early cyber protection protocols like IP and URL blacklists and cyberthreat blocking systems like antivirus programs and firewalls.
Cybercrime increased into the 2000s with notable cyberattacks like the “ILOVEYOU” worm that caused upwards of $15 billion in damages. Spam, botnets, and trojans became more prevalent, and the need for more powerful and proactive cybersecurity measures became more clear. It was the advent of advanced persistent threats (APTs), however, that ignited the cyberthreat intelligence movement. Businesses and governments alike created cyberthreat intelligence teams, while cybersecurity firms began helping organizations better anticipate and prevent cyberthreats.
Since 2010, cyberattackers have become more sophisticated and damaging. Complex hacks, malware, and ransomware attacks led to a shift in CTI that focused on threat actors’ tactics, techniques, and procedures, now referred to as TTPs. These comprehensive analyses give organizations the insights and understanding needed to anticipate threats rather than simply reacting to them.
Modern cyberthreat intelligence is integral to any cybersecurity program, affecting resource allocation, threat analysis policies, and incident response plans.
Operational threat intelligence provides real-time, actionable insights into active cyber threats targeting an organization. It includes details on adversary TTPs, attack campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities. Operational CTI enables SOCs, incident response teams, and DevSecOps engineers to anticipate and mitigate threats by implementing targeted detections, blocking malicious infrastructure, and enhancing automated defenses.
Unlike strategic intelligence, operational CTI focuses on immediate, short-term risks, often delivered through TIPs, security telemetry, and adversary tracking feeds.
The cyber kill chain is a model developed by Lockheed Martin that maps an attack's lifecycle in seven stages:
The cyber kill chain helps security teams detect and disrupt adversary campaigns early. While useful, the kill chain has limitations against modern threats like cloud-native attacks and APTs, which require frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK for more granular threat analysis.
Intrusion detection involves monitoring networks and systems for malicious activity using signature-based (known attack patterns) and behavioral-based (anomaly detection) techniques.
Intrusion detection systems (IDS) analyze logs, traffic, and system behavior to identify unauthorized access, malware infections, and policy violations. In cloud environments, intrusion detection extends to workload security, API monitoring, and identity-based anomaly detection. Advanced detection integrates AI and threat intelligence to detect evasive threats in real time.
APT groups are organized threat actors—often state-sponsored, criminal syndicates, or hacktivists—that conduct prolonged, sophisticated cyber operations. Groups like APT29 (Russia), APT41 (China), and Lazarus Group (North Korea) employ advanced malware, supply chain attacks, and cloud exploitation techniques. These groups use persistent footholds, leveraging stolen credentials and living-off-the-land (LOTL) techniques to evade detection.
Security teams track APTs using TTPs mapped to MITRE ATT&CK to strengthen defenses against cloud-based espionage, intellectual property theft, and geopolitical cyber threats.